Instead of pushing your own book, why not point your audience to Judea Pearl's, which was actually updated AFTER your own exposition?
-
-
-
...you have a good point, here. Yes. Studied Pearl for 10 years, but I still cannot quite understand him. I will. Pinker, I'll continue to ignore.
-
Oh cool! Sorry, I didn't know you'd studied Pearl/causation, so please ignore my tweets referring to the causation literature.
-
Oh, no, I need the refresher and I didn't ever know that SEP had such great details -- I will read them slowly and twice!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is why I love the work of
@noamchomskyT, albeit, he has raised the curtain of Oz, as if taking the red pill of the matrix, once you learn what he has found, you may lose a substantial amount of whatever Patriotism for the US that you have left.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't be that groundbreaking - it would fix some of the problems if it really covered the key issues!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like Aquinas when it comes to things causal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.