-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) You're a bright guy, and I really like your work. Your strawmanning of religious belief belies that. You don't have to believe to behave respectfully of others. The problem of evil is one that religious traditions have wrestled with for millennia, some with greater success
-
2) and to more coherent result than others. Attacking caricatures of the less rigorous does not advance the good. A cogent argument can be made that the loss of the social and psychological supports until relatively recently provided by religious belief and practice has in ...
-
3) fact contributed to the prevalence of collapse into the sort of resentful nihilism that is expressed in mass killing of innocents. Our best and brightest fail us when they engage so far beneath their capacity, and with such contempt for that which they cannot yet explain.
-
Can you explain why Europe, which is far more atheistic also has far fewer school shootings?
-
Lots of differences within Europe let alone with the US. Different cultures, social welfare systems, mental health care programs, firearms access, population size, community cohesion. Exposure to US media is a big one, as we have made a powerful meme of the school shooter here.
-
That said, the point here is not to dissect the mass killing phenomena, but rather to elevate the level of discourse around religion. Religious belief has been a human universal for longer than we have history, and remains nearly so today. The subject warrants proper treatment.
-
Elevating the stature of religious belief is problematic. It gives people the false impression that unjustifiable beliefs should be taken seriously. Allowing scientific thinking to be challenged by wishful thinking is bad for all of us. For example: the issue of global warming.
-
Denigrating the stature of religious belief is a problem, given that we have evolved with it. Accepting you as the arbiter of truth and designer of functioning societies would be similarly dangerous.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think you're being cheeky but the point on God being banned from schools is in providing a moral foundation that prevents the shooters from developing -- not a magical wizard that stops bullets.
-
Kids have a better chance at building good morals without belief in a genocidal, misogynist, vengeful war god who permitted slavery. (By the way, the Austin bomber was homeschooled by Christians).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If you're interested in the problem of evil in the world, it's called Theodicy. The Wikipedia article on it is a good starting point.
-
Nah, that would require actual reading.
-
That too. But first of all, honest curiosity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think you’re wrong. What they really mean is that what is missing is the set of Judeo-Christian values that, if more broadly adopted, would create circumstances that reduce the likelihood of a serious school shooting incident.
-
Can you explain why the most Christian states have the most gun violence? The Bible Belt has far more gun homicides than the less religious California and New York.pic.twitter.com/zkuXwxYmMP
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This cartoon attacks the strawman of a literal interpretation of the Bible, rather than the actual argument of a deficit of meaning and morality in people's lives.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.