Jasså omtaler det selv i tredje person nå... litt høy på pæra blitt?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
coupled with the arguments of
@themoralarc , would it be unfair to assume that one implication of your findings is that the trajectory of our 'moral' considerations is positive?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s an inherent flaw in your book In how you define wepic.twitter.com/qOgaSP36Zv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your body creates blood just like the ‘brain’ creates ideas, but no one claims they can create blood So how can you claim ideas are of your creation, that are no more a function of the body than blood is You can’t That’s called narcissism So who is creating ideas
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Define “We” At what point in history would you choose to be a pig a cow a chicken Would it be before humans enslaved and unnecessarily murdered them in their billions every week to eat their flesh for pleasure, even though they don’t need to anymore Enlightenment ?? FOR WHOpic.twitter.com/LiOMJHzULJ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're the picture of the vapid American. Slogans, slogans, bullshit, and slogans...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're wrong about trump - he is not anti humanist, he is just the natural reaction to an over emphasis of postmodern theories that don't improve things like good empirical science does. I know you can't say this to your bougie friends though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Loved your latest book.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.