Why would it be gene-environment correlation rather than that cross-training has synergistic benefits, that cross-training provides skills and physiological processes that people developing sport-specific training regimes often overlook? Why go straight to genes?
-
-
-
Because genes are easier to compare to each other, as those are "just data". You get what you measure. But the main issue is expecting that a correlation between genes and success in a specific sport would explain things work is an issue. Reduction of environmental factors etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ah, so training later rather than earlier can help prevent a mismatch between vicarious parental ambition and genetic predisposition. Got it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And vice versa, Jared diamonds dangerous excuse narrative needs to fall
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why I’m surrounded by alcoholics Kolaci. Hugs. Hics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems like early allowances for children to be a jack of all trades provides a better footing for them to choose to become a master of what they are most in tune with. Learn more of the nuances of many things and then spend the hours on the thing that really speak to them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
基因与环境的相关性(你的基因会影响你选择的环境)解释了为什么过早训练会伤害孩子的奥运机会,与空白/ 10,000小时理论相反。
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wasn't the 10,000 hours theory debunked many times?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
your genes affect the environment you choose ... i kinda disagree swing about and then lets see ... 0.o ..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.