On my desk today I have 7 domestic violence charges (four by strangulation; all female victims) and a rape (by 15 year old male of 6 year old male). The laws they violated do not mention gender and make no difference in how we handle the cases. Int’l law can do same. Make the...
-
-
-
...metrics based on determining an aggressor and each party’s physical characteristics. Evidence is evidence is evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Time for evidence-based *everything* policies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Evidence based? what an oppressive patriarchic concept... Before we can even think about that we need to end outrage-culture
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lieberman_jason@jordanbpeterson@BretWeinstein Yes! Thank you Steven Pinker for putting your impeccable reputation and credentials on the line for truth! Convince more of your colleagues to follow! Among academics, the scientists still have courage!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“For decades, it was fashionable to call the concept of truth – even scientific truth – into question.” Why aren’t names and works mentioned? It’s always some vague boogeyman. If you want to fight anti-science, there’s an ark in Kentucky...
-
There were links to studies in the article. Or you could watch the news. If you haven’t heard the term ‘fake news’ and ‘post fact’ recently I’d say pay attention
-
What a condescending non-reading of my question... So, I should watch the news to find citations of works that this article finds destructive? Nonsense. Thanks, bot. I expect it from Quillette.
-
There WERE links in the article. No need to play dumb
-
Did I ask for a link to the article, bot?
-
I thought you commented because you read the article. My mistake. Bleep blop bloop
-
Remarkable how you didn’t read my mind sooner.
#evidencebased -
No idea what you’re talking about. Good luck with the rest of your trolling. Cheers!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You will be burned at the stake... that is heresy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The push back on postmodernism gives me hope. You have my gratitude
@QuilletteMThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No doubt decisions should be informed by evidence, but I worry that this downplay that values shape what we consider to be evidence and how to make it (what methods, what assumptions, what standards, etc). "Evidence-based" too often becomes a convenient means for sneaking in bias
-
But have you read the piece to understand the key issue highlighted there?
-
What I got from the piece is that the author is unsure what she's asking for. Asking for more "ideologically diverse" perspectives is different than calling for a singular scientific truth. The latter jives w/ everything we know from phil/soc of science, the latter does not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.