I'm afraid this entire article falls victim to lukewarmism.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Bill never proposed that.
-
He chose it for a modeling exercise. He acknowledged it was arbitrary. Relevant text here. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/365/1/WP-75-063.pdf …pic.twitter.com/ezWrAEGdkl
-
Indeed. And he changed his tune soon after, thanks to the late great Ralph d'Arge.
-
yes, his modeling consistently showed economically optimal mitigation path took ppm well beyond 450
-
shows / takes, not showed / took or do you know something I do not?
-
no, i haven't actually looked at it in a while but my sense was that more recent DICE runs have found economically optimal to be lower than past runs...
-
good DICE has indeed advocated more stringent climate policy in recent years
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.