How about Noam Chomsky's comment on B.F. Skinner that a dog can't learn human language regardless how much we train the dog? It's a brain thing.
And this:
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/08/17/ray-kurzweil-does-not-understa/ …
Does #StevenPinker understand the brain? Or you think it is a machine learning thing?
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
but don't forget, cognition is an EXPERIENCE, not merely information processing. An old-timely adding machine can process info, but is it experiencing? Isn't AI just a radically advanced adding machine? Attributing (inferring) consciousness could be an anthropomorphic projection.
-
i'm referring to human cognition, as we experience it. we could redefine cognition here as AI-based cognition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Only if you take the narrow, structure-focused view of language. A broader evolutionary and ontological view shows this to be one small part of a bigger puzzle, i.e. the socio-cognitive preconditions for symbolic communication: Tomasello, M. (2010) Origins of Human Communication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If an AI system can do the work of both biological evolution and neural systems and develop language, how would that impact the nature-nurture debate?
-
I'm trying to understand that too... Nurture is the adaptation side. Learning is adaptation... so I assume it has to do with starting to map out how things are learned with intent to be more accurate with categories.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
After that, please study the minimum amount of innate mechanisms necessary for an intelligent system to unlearn something (e.g. bias).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Otherwise, you end up with this: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=31831
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the minimum number needed for fast computers may not be the number that actually supported human learning. Blank slate-ish learning, based on very few innate mechanisms, could be possible for AI. But less efficient and not what happened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your abstract has some academese.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for sharing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Over to you,
@Steve_Sailer.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you kindly for keeping it accessible to ones unable to pay!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Once we've established that, how do we show the minimum amount of innate mechanisms necessary for a Member of Parliament (or Congressman) to learn something (e.g. deductive reasoning).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.