"Experts caution that earthly explanations often exist for such incidents" Often?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you not think you're somewhat on thin sloppy thinking ice after Blank Slate and Better Angels?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The footage and testimony is genuinely compelling and interesting. Why the gripe over writing about it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want to believe!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Accelerated like nothing I've ever seen", clearly hasn't checked the celebrity sexual harassment news files.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You think this is fantastical yet believe utopia is nigh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure it's nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Big fan, but taken aback at dismissal of this seemingly valid data point. AF pilots known to be faithful observers. Science much?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A real question, not snark: Were you nonplussed about the Bem/ESP article from 2011? Or was it partially redeemed with data, flawed as the data might have been? Many went on the record in a January 2011 NYT article deriding the topic itself as beneath inquiry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s like
@nytimes is unraveling. I used to rely on them, now I never read it. Still follow some of heir journalists. Time for another letter, I guess. -
And that letter might be ‘t’!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.