Until Kim Jong-un bombs their plants or there is an unlikely earthquake or an employee turns out to be a Stephen Paddock. And so on.
-
-
-
.
@Paradigmian@sapinker Nuclear energy is good. -
Until it's not. If you mess up with wind mills or solar panels you don't get the consequences. Chernobyl is still reaping cancer victims.
-
Is that US or worldwide?
-
Nuclear is crazy safe, even when counting higher end [sane] Chernobyl estimates. And wo nuclear climate change mitigation is a lot harder
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Okay, I am surprised you like like nuclear power. So you must have an idea of how to best deal with waste and the risk of catastrophe?
-
Fukushima undoubtedly also had a catastrophe plan, to no avail.
-
It availed just fine. They shut down 8 hours before the tsunami hit. It was the dirt-old deisel generators in the basement that failed.
-
omg wait this is comedy; Leila, you misunderstood, this guy's a humorist. When he's famous we won't be able to afford tix to his show

-
Twitter is so much fun. Talking about complex, nuanced topics in 140 character thoughts? What could go wrong?
-
Well, some 'problems' are so small that tweet length is warranted. Like nuclear safety ones. I'm serious here.A real problem: climate change
-
false "choice"
-
Not at all. "Renewables" cannot hope to supply our energy demands and hydrocarbons worsen Climate Change. Nuclear handles both.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How long before there's a band called "Atomic Humanists"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Statistically the safest energy, solar and batteries can't provide base load power . Small reactors safe and new designs have little waste.
-
What was Fukashima? Our planet is forever changed.
-
Older reactor, shouldn't have been built there.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.