Disagree. Same media coverage is seen worlwide. It is unlikely we’ll see a copycat outside the USA. Something to think about.
-
-
-
Good point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The assumption being notoriety is the goal. It won't always be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1516 mass shootings in 1735 days The US has an accelerating violence problem that censoring reportage isn't going to address.
-
I agree the proposal is weak at best, w/ a lot of potential to backfire. Where did you get your data of 1516 mass shootings?
-
1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one charthttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2017/oct/02/america-mass-shootings-gun-violence?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But unfortunately this strategy could sow more mistrust/paranoia and generate yet more crazy conspiracy theories.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quit stifling the first amendment right of media syndicates to sell advertising
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not saying the experts are wrong, but morbid curiosity will always get the best of us. It's a ratings bonanza and the news is a biz.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Steven, can you please link to evidence supporting the assertions in the letter, especially regarding shooter motivation?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do any studies use "anonymous fame" controls? Terrorists care for their cause; "ticking bombs" care for their masterpiece. Not personalized?
-
Consider, even serial killers seem to prefer being pseudonymically famous and uncaught, over personal fame, I think?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is profit in the coverage , therefore coverage will increase.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most of them end up dead. So what attention? I agree generally with this, but...it's not enough.
-
It's not attention as a person. It's knowing you made a mark on history. Sane people can't understand those without a soul.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But what about the Ratings?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Why is there not more attention on this issue? Fame and lengthy news-biographies accompany each horrific event.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you for sharing this. I am skeptical that this incident is correctly labeled 'terrorism'. Attention seeking is completely different...
-
How so? Seems very atrention-seeking to me.
-
I mean, terrorism seems very attention-seeking to me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.