Hard to believe even Pinker is still promoting this idiot book considering how thoroughly Stephen Jay Gould eviscerated it.http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1992/11/19/the-confusion-over-evolution/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd say this is another false dichotomy: 'not instruments of sexual selection, but…“honest signals” of some greater underlying fitness'.
-
That's my take as well. No better way to show you have your act together than being forced to show you have your act together
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting, I'd like to put that book in the reading queue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IMO the root of the division is people's desire that natural selection be code for moral approbation of the selected organisms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it possible that the male peacock mimics a blueberry tree?pic.twitter.com/q1RzW2th7z
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The true false dichotomy is nature vs nurture. The gene-centric view of evolution is wrong.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060581/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ok ok ok. But let me ask you this. What does subsume mean?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there an Audible version coming soon?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fyi
@cronin_helena is on twitterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.