"Spirituality kills". One might as easily say "metabolising kills". An impoverished notion of spirit, unworthy of a Pinker. Dawkins, maybe.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't this a spiritual remark in itself?
-
No, it's not. Are you doing the old "Isn't atheist just another type of religion" routine?
-
the problem with the statement is that its logic is: if everybody thinks the way I do all'll be fine
-
By your mode of thinking, no one should express an opinion or try to convince anyone of anything.
-
that would surely make a peaceful world :-) but no, i'm just responding to the sweeping nature of this statement.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Have you read it? Is it as autistic as I imagine it being?
-
Whatever you're imagining the reality is worse.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
What a confused and nonsensical statement. This is what passes for a Harvard prof?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
this is a bit extreme.
-
It depends on how much religion you are trying to cover with the term “spirituality.”
-
we should be okay with just making a living? wtf?
-
Spirituality Kills . . .we should be ok making a living . . . selling enlightenment manuals


https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/895272549155602432 …
-
omg. smh.
-
Pinker is lightweight intelligentsia. Noway I would read about everything he has read and his discussion on "enlightenment" in his book.
-
Pinker being a lightweight still doesn’t eclipse the truth of what he’s said, that very clearly throughout history, spirituality has killed.
-
thanks mom.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.