These sound like rules for the most basic chat bots. We are way beyond that in real world.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that the purpose of the IRobot stories was to illustrate why such rules wouldn't work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AI is not possible. Remember John Searle' s Chinese room
-
nobody takes that seriously
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you! I'm a huge fan of your work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So many smart ppl fail to recognize the additional challenges associated w high competency in AI. This article totally ignores it as well.
-
namely?
-
Take a look at the concerns of Nick Bostrom, Max Tegmark, Sam Harris, Yuval Noah Harari, and Eliezer Yudkowsky.
-
Are any of them AI researchers?
-
Appeals to authority aren't useful. The quality of their argument is what matters. Take a look.
-
I read a very long book by Bostrum. Lots of scary thought experiments, but nothing based on current AI reality.
-
Maybe you should read Enrico Fermi's scary thought experiments before nuclear bombs became a reality.
-
But he was an actual nuclear researcher who understood the capabilities of the technology. Hence my "appeal to authority".
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How will laws help solve the trolley problem for example?
-
By creating consistency for how AI vehicles should behave, which makes all AI vehicles safer and in turn the roads safer for everyone.
-
I understand the need for laws. But the alleged "sci-fi" like solution called value alignment must be the first and foremost.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously? "AI should just obey the law"? Good luck making "the law" mathematically precise. Anthropomorphizing AI != considering solutions.
-
AI does not need mathematical precision anymore than people do
-
Telling an AI to "just follow the law" is like telling a Boston Dynamics robot to "just run". C'mon, it's SO EASY!
-
i have no interest is mocking strawman arguments
-
Even if an AI fully understands the law how do you guarantee it cares to follow it?
-
the proposal wasn't that AI follow the law it was that people could not evade responsibility by blaming AI.
-
It says "we don't want AI to...", repeatedly; then it says ppl must anticipate everything the AI does for accountability. So... outlaw AI?
-
I think we are coming from such different places that Twitter medium will not work for us
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.