You really should have read the actual @sciam statement and the articles before linking this outraged bloghttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-new-science-of-sex-and-gender/?sf107835508=1 …
-
-
-
Pinker & followers don't need to read for themselves if another socio-biologist tells them it's so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lysenko got the editorship at last, has zhe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I see that exactly opposite. Erasing women does not bring them equality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coyne seems to be reading things in the article that aren't there & doing what he accuses
@sciam of doing w/ the science. -
I came to similar conclusions to
@sciam when I looked at the issue for a piece on@BillNye's show about sex spectrumhttp://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2017/05/17/bill-nye-saves-the-world-episode-9-the-sexual-spectrum-review/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@pzmyers compares arguing with creationists and to arguing with evo-psychos to good effecthttps://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2017/08/21/its-a-bad-time-to-be-a-gender-essentialistevo-psych-advocate/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Basis of evo-psycho is that men and women are opposites - anything that questions that premise makes them panic & spew bullshit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we don't know who the women are how can we tell who has the inferior STEM brains??? Panic time for essentialists Pinker & Coyne.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Simplistic description of the article from Pinker & Coyne. Of course.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By SciAm's logic then, denying sex diffs to allow for equality, would we have to deny diffs in skin colour to have racial equality? Brutal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the valley of intersexes point is key. The left greatly overstates its size while the right altogether denies its existence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. How do you refer to groups without labelling them?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who owns and who sponsors Scientific American? Always ask what shapes the sources we follow, and how might they mean to shape us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The rights of humans come from reason and compassion. They do not and should not depend in any way on biological attributes of individuals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SciAm has left the Science Building.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Human rights do not require the denial of science. The fine folks of
@sciam should read The Moral Landscape by@SamHarrisOrgThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Intersex conditions exists. Therefore, transgender people are in wrong gender. Disagreement means you hate women? Do I have this right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.