Q:if claimed changes will actually save any $ are true & not lower quality, why wouldn't ppl do this anyway? Ignores benefits from warming
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and you are the tooth fairy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You spend a lot of time encouraging overpopulation and saying it's a great thing, but now you pretend to care about climate change?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn't matter what the cost. It's change or die.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder how much more feasible it would be to aggressively attack population growth? Emancipation of women, education.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A permanent protection racket.
-
As if the same can't be said for Big Oil's paid skeptics.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would estimate the cost in lives rather than cash. We will have to reduce the population by prob. 5 billion, minimum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty sure that the answer will lie in new genetically engineered pseudo-species that can respire CO2 into O2 & also secretes nanotubes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
False premise. Better question: What is the cost benefit to adaptation vs. mitigation?
-
Most studies I've read suggest seawalls just won't cut it w the amount of sea-level rise that is projected. There'll be unavoidable losses.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.