if you divorce a paper from the author's body of work, you judge it differently! this certainly nullifies the better informed judgement.
-
-
-
why would anyone object to a speaker saying the sky is blue!? oh yeah the speaker is a phrenologist, but whatever
-
Tweet unavailable
-
hm lefties object to someone saying 2+2=4? you must hate maths! yes the guy saying it is a war criminal, what's that got to do with anything
-
Consider that even when they knew who it was they said it was middle of the road
-
perhaps "the scientific racism guy's talk wasn't judged to be all that bad" isn't the stellar defence you think it is
-
You're still mischaracterizing Murray's work :)
-
he's miscaracterising black people, so I'm sure that's just par for the course
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When that Marxist speaker last month at that college was assaulted by right wing thugs...oh yeah, that didn't happen to any Marxist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
because college profs aren't remotely leftist
-
as compared to the general population they are
-
nah, you're confusing moderate/liberal with leftist
-
oh. I'd still expect leftist overepresentation, but it's true that not nearly as much as the liberal one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Currently planning a study like this. I'm convinced we heuristically process political text according to author attributions - not content.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
moderate is clearly the new extreme. not to mention, moderation (in pursuit of justice) is no virtue. So moderation must be banished. QED.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what kind of scores do other texts get in such conditions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe the point is Charles Murray and history of being a racist crank. Guess the students can see the woods unlike yourself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if it were provocative he should have been allowed to speak.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facts will not sway the opinion of an imbecile.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.