. @sapinker have you ever read any history of science? Tuskegee? eugenics? Hiroshima? You need more social engagement, not less.
-
-
-
I gave up on Pinker a long time ago
evolutionary psychologists are the worst -
not to brag but I gave up on Pinker way back in the 90s
-
everytime I see something about him I wonder why the rest of the world has not done the same
-
I thought "The Language Instinct" was poorly argued and overshot its evidence-based framework. Pinker is trash
-
I learned about him in an intro to ed class then found out about the gender debate we was death to me
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I was sexually assaulted in the federal gov't bldg in DC where I conduct research. http://www.theverge.com/2016/10/24/13359794/smithsonian-sexual-misconduct-investigation-miguel-pinto …
-
Sexual misconduct is not a "distraction." It is a threat to the careers and livelihoods of countless scientists.
-
The issue of sexual misconduct in the sciences must be addressed - we can't afford to keep losing talented
#WomenInSTEM bc of this issue. -
If male scientists were getting punched in the face while doing their research, everyone would see that as a threat to science.
-
Sexual misconduct is just as damaging to the practice of science and it threatens the integrity (& reputation) of our profession.
-
To minimize the importance of this issue by calling it a “distraction” is a betrayal of half the people who make science happen.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, Prof, but they haven't after all. Science is intersectional
pic.twitter.com/nek9GD3QWP
-
That's not the purpose of the march though. It's for science and the policies surrounding it. Am I mistaken?
-
that's nice dear
-
That was a genuine question. I could be mistaken, but their mission statement defines the march around science-based policies.Right?
-
how does a policy of diversity acknowledgement take anything away from that? - it doesn't
-
I see what you mean. But, I can also see how it could be seen a distraction from the main purpose. :)
-
not really no
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.