when there's no conflict empathy can guide moral action; but when there is a moral dilemma, empathy alone can be limiting.
-
-
-
Excellent answer. One we need to repeat until civilized societies understand the difference.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Empathy is felt, and thus an automatic reaction not rationlised = animalistic Morality require slow thinking, weighing = human
-
Again, excellent explanation. Thanks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Empathy and compassion are distinct"; that's the main conclusion; true, but rather semantic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just curios do you have any thoughts on Sloan-Wilson's book about altruism?
-
I just get the impression that the disagreement with the inclusive vigor camp is as much about religion as biology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The link is to a debate published by the NY Times. Try reading before commenting.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
empathy is always good. but if excess of it, its counter and become bad. it become cross the moral reason of principle.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There needs to be so many corrections on so many papers that actually gets graded. It's impossible fulfill everyones actions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
guides it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
empathy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.