Disagreeing w @sapinker is usually a strong sign that you are wrong, but this article can't change my mind:
-
-
-
@sapinker It assumes that AI would be more similar to you and I than psychopaths are to us (wrt morality). No reason to think so
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
New conversation
-
-
-
@sapinker Isn't this article misunderstanding Bostrom's reasoning?@FHIOxfordThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agreed with this kind of thinking until I read Superintelligence. Not so sure now. A super AI may be incredibly deceptive
@sapinker - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
@pravengov@sapinker@Slate because we wont be dumb enough to build human-like AIs that have feelings and emotions. I hope. -
@yanderiction@pravengov@sapinker@Slate Yet this is exactly the course of action this article claims we *must* follow!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.