No thanks to your ill-considered screed, Steve @sapinker @stewartbbrand Many people do bioethics w/∆ views & competencies. Good committee.
-
-
-
In case it wasn't clear I was talking about Steve Pinker's oped blasting "bioethics"
@sapinker. I was NOT complaining about@stewartbbrand -
Tho, of course, I can and do complain about Stewart from time to time. On occasion. ; ) & I usually like Steve
@sapinker@stewartbbrand
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker@JoelAchenbach 'man of the material mind' who never considers the existential, spiritual conundrum of 3 parents...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker@JoelAchenbach Oh. So this would only benefit males? And women are ok with this? -
-
@JoelAchenbach@sapinker Understood. Still, this favors men alone, so that's why I asked if the disparate impact was acceptable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker@JoelAchenbach Scientists who can't tell me whether butter is ok to eat now tell me not to worry when they fiddle with human genesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Because, otherwise, bioethicists are insane. Silly ethical concerns, always getting in the way of progress.@washingtonpostThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your books on linguistics are all excellent. But your opinion on this issue is wrong.
@sapinker@washingtonpostThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.