@sapinker A correlation of r=.12 is explained mostly by genes. Not sure how this correlation is sociologically important.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Congrats on paper & endorsement
@Rosalind_Arden_ MT “@sapinker: not just important but a model of clear sci writing http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/long/dyv112v1 …” -
@laurie_jh Thanks Laurie, (one can't help having a bit of a science-crush on SP who even extemporises in prose! -
@laurie_jh I enjoyed Hawk. You? Also, A Shepherd's Life (Rebanks), and that BG txtbk is a 'bible'. -
@Rosalind_Arden_ absolutely loved it. It's actually sat there on my desk waiting to go to@KailiRimfeld ... And thanks - I'll seek that out
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker Perfect study for my AP Psych kids to dissect this year...so many facets of psychology included.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker thanks. That certainly lived up to your promoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Prof. Pinker, Do you think it would have had a better correlation with health span rather than lifespan?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.