@sapinker Wonder if this will change the opinions of those who have already decided that majority male=sexist discrimination, oh wait.......
-
-
-
@sapinker ...... we know they won't. It's a dogmatic assumption, believed to be true regardless of what the facts say.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@policecar One study hires profs, another undergrads. Different years, different samples. Statistical error. Conformation bliars.@sapinker -
-
@policecar (and one is a magnitude larger) -
@Plinz I know but it's not profs vs. undergrads which is 2+ magnitudes. -
@policecar “undergraduate science student who had ostensibly applied for a science laboratory manager position”, etc -
@Plinz yes & the others were applications for assistant professorships which most likely means they weren't already profs before. but detail -
@policecar One position asked for someone qualified as undergrad, the other for someone qualified as an assistant prof.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
@sapinker The fact that someone like you considers this study shocking is a bit telling.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gender bias or supply issue? 2:1 odds (women:men): talented women should apply for tenure-track positions! https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/587776880331386880 …
@sapinkerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Shocker?" To the contrary, doh!
@sapinker: Shocker of a study: experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.