@sapinker No, but the environment before the women get to university clearly is.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facts are stubborn things - John Adams. “
@sapinker: Academic Science Isn’t Sexist http://nyti.ms/1wP8UjN ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@sapinker .@socalsysbio the data does not appear to be consistent with their (Ceci's) assertions: http://www.emilywillinghamphd.com/2014/11/academic-science-is-sexist-we-do-have.html … Nor their funding. -
@timtriche@sapinker@socalsysbio Neither does that critique. I checked some of the tables and graphs suggested and differences are minimal -
@albertocairo@sapinker@socalsysbio I commend the authors for making the summaries available; would be wonderful if raw data accessible too -
@timtriche@socalsysbio ...Except Economics and 1/2 more. Rest is sampling error, likely. Problem: Truncated Y-axispic.twitter.com/dEk7UksUtp
-
@albertocairo@socalsysbio this seems to be a psychology paper. Some "LPS" referees still believe in p-values, I'm told. Tragic - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker@DanFranksRsrch Hahaha. Good joke. Very funny.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*anymore(?) “
@sapinker: Academic Science Isn’t Sexist http://nyti.ms/1wP8UjN ” -
Tweet unavailable
-
@cinderstina Do you think that may be anecdotal? That's what this study is concerned with.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
RT
@sapinker: Academic Science Isn’t Sexist http://nyti.ms/1wP8UjNThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker May be somewhat true in US, worldwide, not so sure,Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.