@sapinker Would disagree with this statement. R. T. Cox, IMO, demonstrated that this is not true. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/080186982X?pc_redir=1410499882&robot_redir=1 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Would disagree with this statement. R. T. Cox, IMO, demonstrated that this is not true. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/080186982X?pc_redir=1410499882&robot_redir=1 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@sapinker "philosophy" is simply careful thinking when topic gets hard, eg every time science or logic gets hard they call it "philosophy".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Except that science is not an answer, it's a way to find an answer.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@sapinker and if it ever succeeded, that would mean philosophy's greatest achievement was to give way to scienceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@sapinker problem is, phil. of science has produced no widely accepted consensus justification for science, just bitter controversyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker can we watch your debate with Leon Wieseltier anywhere??Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker SCIENCE is systematic.God is systemic.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.