@sapinker Tiny correlations (if even real)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker looks like classical example -if n big enough the most trivial things come out "significant" -
@david_colquhoun@sapinker bigger n will increase statistical sig. You can't massage the magnitude of effect by increasing n though
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker Well we know how much you love twin studies :P. Article seems a bit speculative at certain points. But interesting if true.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker I reject this study entirely, and this has nothing to do with the fact that I myself am a terrible drawer :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This test still used in Belgian kindergartens “
@sapinker: Children's drawing ability correlated w intelligence later http://pss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/long/0956797614540686v1 …” -
@johnbrown1325@sapinker How much does a belly-button get? I always used to draw those... -
@lottiebbrown@sapinker A sign of spectacular latent intelligence
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker This explains why my children are all artistic geniuses! Correlation is not causation, but Prof Pinker is a reputable source...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker@iarroyo48 I thought you were a fake, but the real Pinker breaks any expectations. Still do hard scienceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.