The media often err by calling the sources "experts," which often is an opinion, not a factual assertion. "Specialist" will do. @sapinker
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Just because we want there to be an expert about future developments, doesn't mean that there is one. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@sapinker D Cheney. B Kristol.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Always thought a news show that interviewed people about their mistaken predictions would be interesting. Told you so + voxsplainThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker IF it serves power. Try criticising (expertly or not) established power & standards change. See Herman & Chomsky propaganda modelThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker ad hominem fallacy goes both waysThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker even worse is substitution of public opinion for expertise, e.g., "do you feel like the economy is improving?"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Julian Simon would have loved it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.