@sapinker How do you know?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@sapinker why do you ignore legitimate research into psi? Have you read the work of these researchers? Why not? http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00017/full … -
@michaelmhughes@sapinker "Legit research in psi" is an oxymoron, has been for ~ 30 years--we tried, statistically-but fraud every time! -
@learnfromerror@sapinker Incorrect. Read the primary research + the meta-analyses + the critiques. Small but statistically significant. -
@michaelmhughes@sapinker Anything can be proved with psi meta-analysis. Give me your ref please -
@learnfromerror see the meta-analyses appended to the open call. Plz read them & the critiques, of course: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00017/full#B7 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker oh wow.. I just read this. Scary stuff going on in academia... -
@LittleStudent@sapinker Scary stuff if you don't like the results, you mean. Psi research is legitimate, even if you find it scary. -
@LittleStudent Look at all these scary scientists, for instance. I guess their academic credentials should be revoked http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00017/full …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker ....in a case of an interpreter it is a receiver, a processor and a transmitter...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.