@sapinker Level of inequality is a good barometer of happiness which is more sensitive to perceived relative affluence than absolute levels
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Thus, if you want to concentrate on the worst off, you're gonna have to tackle to some extent, income inequity.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Problem is, as income becomes more unequal, so does political power, and the wealthy naturally fight against poverty alleviationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker@HBDBibliography But that conflicts with dominant leftist political agenda.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Of course. Inequality does not, in itself, provide any indication of quality of life.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unless inequality obstructs fighting poverty. MT
@sapinker: Maybe we should concentrate on poverty, not inequality. http://goo.gl/STsvG7Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Poverty or inequality is wrong question. Better- is it possible to focus on the former if the later gets too large - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.