@sapinker @HBDBibliography Anxious gatekeeping, Explan. is parsimonious when enough. Inflex. literal scientism maladaptive.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker@RichardDawkins provided no numerical teeth,ie was "hand waving". Genetic epistasis was & remains the missing numerical variable. -
@sapinker@RichardDawkins Genetic Epistasis: two or more genes are absolutely required to be inherited together to code for a single trait.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker@RichardDawkins The adaptation of species is certainly proven, but evolution? C'mon, stop kidding yourselves it's proven.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Darwinism and it's spawn NeoDarwinism are "probably approximately correct" for explaining bits of Evolution. Shrinking bits.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Darwin & "Origin of Species" is quaint. NeoDarwinism is NeoQuaint. Calling oneself "Professor Ceiling Cat" is? Not sure on that...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker the experimentalists, as generally happens, are arriving late and making a mess of theoryThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker environmental changes to the epigenome are uncontroversial, and SNP vs. methylation data aligns down to the lociThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Evolution is certainly true and NeoDarwin Theory is certainly lacking. Why the discomfort in accepting this? I think we know why:)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.