@sapinker I agree w @robertfsiegmund that it=being 'wrong' because as an expmtr you have 'wrongly' assigned meaning to that extreme pattern
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker would 'extreme' be better than 'big' here? Could be a small effect size and significant but actually be chanceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker this means there is a 5% likelihood the result is a chance finding. does a chance finding mean I am wrong?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Shouldn't it be: the chance of finding an effect at least as big, given the null-hypothesis, is aprox. 5%Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker you meant p=0.05 -
@robertfsiegmund@sapinker The first zero is redundant and is therefore omitted (according to APA rules). It's so cool that I know that... -
-
@robertfsiegmund What? That the first zero is redundant? Or were you referring to@sapinker's use of < when speaking of .05 exactly? -
-
@robertfsiegmund@sapinker For figures from a range restricted to 1.0 or less, the first zero is redundant... See: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2010/07/a-post-about-nothing.html … -
-
@robertfsiegmund But you can tell@sapinker how to write his numbers? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.