R @sapinker shocker:#Nature editor misunderstands "p<.05":confusing likelihood w posterior probability http://bit.ly/15IqEld #Math #Science
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Nature did defend Wikipedia. It all makes sense now.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker I do that all the time.@lecanardnoirThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Sad, yes. Shocking, not as much as you would hope.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker We have a response to that article now: http://www.skepticink.com/smilodonsretreat/2013/09/20/response-to-occams-corner-questioning-science/ …@sjzara@QuestionOfFact@harpersnotes@sethgoldinThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@sapinker: It's shocking a Nature editor misunderstands "p<.05" - confuses likelihood w post. prob. http://bit.ly/15IqEld ” @HenryGeeBooksThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker I trained as a statistician because of the woeful understanding of stats at top scientific journals. Much good it did (not) ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.