Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
sapinker's profile
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker
Verified account
@sapinker

Tweets

Steven PinkerVerified account

@sapinker

Cognitive scientist at Harvard.

Boston, MA
pinker.wjh.harvard.edu
Joined January 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Steven Pinker‏Verified account @sapinker 20 Sep 2013

    It's shocking that a Nature editor misunderstands "p<.05" - He confuses likelihood w posterior probability http://bit.ly/15IqEld 

    10:41 AM - 20 Sep 2013
    • 57 Retweets
    • 41 Likes
    • hia baobab Alper Kumcu 🎃 Joe Roberts Sanghyun Kim scumbly blythe Joshua β Viaaaaaaaaau 달구름 Mark Whalan Dr Darren Saunders
    10 replies 57 retweets 41 likes
      1. Graham Chivers  ✏️‏ @deepgreendesign 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        R @sapinker shocker:#Nature editor misunderstands "p<.05":confusing likelihood w posterior probability http://bit.ly/15IqEld  #Math #Science

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. SaganAppreciationSoc‏ @SaganSociety 21 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker Nature did defend Wikipedia. It all makes sense now.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Phil Chandler‏ @BarefootBee 21 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker I do that all the time. @lecanardnoir

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Alex‏ @awblocker 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker Sad, yes. Shocking, not as much as you would hope.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. rbutr‏ @rbutrcom 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker We have a response to that article now: http://www.skepticink.com/smilodonsretreat/2013/09/20/response-to-occams-corner-questioning-science/ … @sjzara @QuestionOfFact @harpersnotes @sethgoldin

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Arman Eshaghi‏ @es_arman 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        “@sapinker: It's shocking a Nature editor misunderstands "p<.05" - confuses likelihood w post. prob. http://bit.ly/15IqEld ” @HenryGeeBooks

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Bill “Scaretician” Price‏ @pdiff1 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker He apparently misunderstands many things. It's unfortunate he's in a position of pub power. Another reason to ditch Nature for OA.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. SaganAppreciationSoc‏ @SaganSociety 21 Sep 2013
        Replying to @pdiff1

        @pdiff1 When Nature defended Wikipedia, it became clear there was a problem.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Lucibee‏ @_Lucibee 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker I trained as a statistician because of the woeful understanding of stats at top scientific journals. Much good it did (not) ;)

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. laura‏ @sans_trousers 20 Sep 2013
        Replying to @sapinker

        @sapinker :(

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info