@sapinker I always had the nagging feeling Nagel was an implicit dualist. Seems explicit, now, with a massive survivorship bias.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker It seems Mr Pinker's tweet doesn't reflect the careful consideration Mr Orr's review provides. Perhaps Pinker should reread it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker The limitations of Nagel's views scarcely justify triumphalist materialism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker Nagel's doubts on the inclusion of philosophically vital matters in science can't be dismissed. BUT Teleology does not help w/that -
@agi_thinks Well said. -
@Ninad_Bondre thanks! can't dismiss philosophy of science outright, wouldn't you say?#nodnodnod
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapinker A long time ago I read Nagel and found his works reasonable. Thank you for correcting my perception.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapinker What do you make of Conway Morris' work on evolutionary convergence & possible teleological implications? http://bit.ly/WUqduZThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.