It’s worth reading what they say about her.https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/linda-gottfredson …
-
-
-
If you get a large chunk of your funding from The Pioneer Fund, which was founded by a eugenicist and has continued to fund research that could be seen as relevant to propagating racist ideas, it goes a bit beyond simple “guilt by association.” As they say, “follow the money.”
-
The Pioneer Fund doesn't even have a website. I'm not sure they even exist anymore.
-
It stopped filing tax returns in 2012, I think. But its assets may have been redistributed to other funds: JSP Education Foundation (which filed a Tax return in Sep 2018) and the Ulster Institute for social Research (which has a Webpage)https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2013/10/22/pioneer-fund-assets-divided-new-leadership-appointed …
-
But as you can see from the SPLC, they funded her work for years and she had made racist statements.
-
Biological properties defining a differential in specific human gene pools based on evolutionary biology is a reality. Would acknowledging those differences in an objective manner be racist to you?
-
You have 19 twitter followers, so it’s probably a bad idea to take you seriously. But this quote of hers is racist. IQ is not a measure of intelligence. The groups she is identifying are not distinct in this way (or for some, in any way) from the general population.pic.twitter.com/OI8TulW4mZ
-
Also, you’re approving cites and links to the gateway pundit gets you muted
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
McCarthyite? I guess it’s perfectly fine to accept white nationalist funding? On top of that, we should give that tainted research a platform? Please explain.
-
Read the comments after the article. I learned some things. Maybe you will, too.
-
I, as a rule, don’t rely on comment sections for information but if you point me to the relevant cited information I would be happy to give it a read.
-
Begins here, far down the page, regarding the org with which I was not acquainted. There is a counter response to this comment, further down the page. Eugenics is such a touchy topic, and rightly so, is easy to mistake genetic husbandry for abuse.pic.twitter.com/5Tcw852wez
-
What hell point is this trying to make?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Southern Poverty Law Center is on their own list.
-
Aw look at all Pinker's racist fans who hate a venerable organization fighting racists and bigots. I keep thinking Pinker can sink no lower into the Quillette/racist muck, and he keeps proving me wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Imagine if leftists weren't allowed to voice their concerns about known racists. Or if they did, that they were met with ridicule instead. I wonder what a free speech loving right wing would say about that.
-
Pinker, Harris, Peterson, and other fake smart people would love that. They espouse free speech but want to shut down criticisms.
-
They absolutely do. And they'll block any and all critics. They experience criticism as oppression.
-
I dunno about the others, but Harris specifically was born into massive wealth.
-
So was Dawkins, who is part of that race science crowd. Dawkins family made its fortune through slaves.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9091007/Slaves-at-the-root-of-the-fortune-that-created-Richard-Dawkins-family-estate.html …
-
Harris' money comes from The Golden Girls. But yeah, if you've never worried about the basics, like ever, maybe criticism is horrible oppression.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.