I enjoyed your chat with Jordan Peterson however I felt it ended at the point it started to get most interesting, I very much hope to see the two of you have another conversation.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't the point about climate science not that its results are unreproducible but that the predictions it makes are unfalsifiable?
-
No you're thinking of string theory ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The exception becomes the rule.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3/ Yet the article implies these are either absolutely correct or well known. They aren't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/ The issue most skeptics have isn't the basics physics, it is the models, the assumptions the models use (feedbacks/etc) and the accuracy of past data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1/Oddly, the article about misleading goes on to mislead about climate skeptics and the issues they raise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very exciting article! Maybe the best! I thought all that hope-y change-y stuff was also very ambiguous and also emotional language. Reminds me of 1984.
-
Bloomberg is going the Lords work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sadly, often applied in discrediting harm reduction alternatives to smoking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.