Brooks says: "In this new context, I’m curious to know how lenses get crafted. For example, intersectionality is a lens that was created by theorists decades ago and is now a way of seeing that many people use to organize their view of reality. How did that happen?"
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Well, I guess...but there's a not-so-faint whiff of something off about it in the op ed, not to mention the faux-mystery about intersectionality's uptake and its frequent distortion...
Näytä tämä ketju -
And here I'd put a SMDH meme if I only knew how...
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
It's not 1/1, so I'm not breaking my New Yrs' resolution: never click on Brooks. Here's what he says: "intersectionality is a lens that was created by theorists decades ago and is now a way of seeing that many people use to organize their view of reality. How did that happen?"
-
My brain has been a no-Brooks Zone now for over a year and is much happier.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
He thinks it's a 4-way stop outside a diner in a small town in western PA that his limo driver once drove him past so he could mingle with real Americans.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
David Brooks is broken.
-
Well, what do you expect? He drove his keyboard into the intersection without looking where he was going.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Taking a wild guess here, but it seems like he sees intersectionality as ppl saying “I’m x, y, z identities, I have these experiences”... but it stops short of the actual way you’ve theorized the term i.e. interlocking oppressions due to those identities.
-
Intersectionality isn’t a lens just for some; it affects us all.

- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.