They're not feeling dyspnea due to CO2 buildup because they're not actually building up CO2; they're ventilating plenty via increased respiratory rate. And indeed they tend to have low measured blood CO2 levels.
-
Show this thread
-
V/Q mismatch impairs BOTH getting O2 in and getting CO2 out. But it usually results in low O2 and *normal*, not high, CO2, since any rise in CO2 results in more respiratory drive. (at least that's what Wikipedia says. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ventilation/perfusion_ratio …)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
(I'm new to all this stuff, bear with me.)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Why doesn't "silent hypoxemia" stay harmless? If I understand the article correctly, this is because you're breathing so much more that there's an increase in "inspiratory intrathoracic pressure", and this damages the lung, causing "P-SILI", or patient-self-inflicted lung injury.
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
If you make a sheep hyperventilate, it damages its lungs, for instance.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00255628 …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Now patients who previously had a *little* bit of lung damage have a LOT of lung damage. And therefore it looks more like typical ARDS: low compliance, high lung weight, high recruitability, and much bigger lung lesions visible on a chest CT.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
logically this implies: keep patients from hyperventilating while they're still in "silent hypoxemia" so they don't breathe so much they progress to full-blown severe ARDS.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
how do you do this? it looks like it's a matter of debate right now. one thing I've seen in a couple papers is "use work of breathing to determine when to intubate". Patient can't breathe too hard if a machine's breathing for them!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
The big conclusion the COVID19 paper draws about patients with low oxygen but no dyspnea is *give 'em lots of oxygen.* Tradeoffs are more ambiguous about PEEP.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
The other conclusion is that you want to intubate when the inspiratory pressure swings are starting to get big, as controlling the breathing rate can *prevent* additional lung injury.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
"As esophageal pressure swings increase from 5 to 10 cmH2O—which are generally well tolerated—to above 15 cmH2O, the risk of lung injury increases and therefore intubation should be performed as soon as possible."
-
-
Also, if we could figure out *how* COVID19 blocks hypoxic vasoconstriction, and find a way to make it *stop*, those "silent hypoxemic" patients could get their V/Q back to normal, and thus would no longer be hypoxemic (since they don't have much lung damage to begin with.)
0 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.