“I don’t care how nice, smart, or “reasonable” you are, I’m not gonna accept your excuses until the cost (or death rate, or w/e) goes down” is the attitude you need here.
-
-
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
Because bureaucrats *are* nice, sincere, and extremely well educated. They will always have plausible reasons, which they actually believe, why some source of delay or cost is necessary. And, typically, you will get your explanation and feel sheepish and not push.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
(Trump is a boor but not a fanatic; he is willing to “disrespect” experts by pushing them on timelines and asking “stupid” but often essential questions, but he’s *not* monomaniacally focused on a single desired outcome, no matter the social cost.)
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
Jeff Bezos is, by all accounts, a fanatic in this sense about cost-cutting within Amazon. I am not sure we have ever had a fanatic US President.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
A fanatic asks “ok but does it help with the Outcome?” every. single. time. to the point where if upending his own organization will help, he’ll do that. Larry Kramer was a fanatic. That’s why he got kicked out of the org he founded.
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
When you meet a fanatic, you realize how many of your preconceptions about “necessity” are fake. “But you Need to pay a salary this high!” Do you? Or could you relocate to somewhere unfashionable? hire people who didn’t go to fancy schools but can still do the work?
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
“but you Need to write a formal report!” Do you? how does that change the Outcome?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
“Ok but now your org is disrespectable, unprofessional, and a really stressful place to work!” “Ok but does that change the Outcome?”
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
“but you’re alienating people!” “Ok does that change the Outcome?”
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
“But the people doing it the other way are so much more technologically advanced and smarter than you!” “Ok but are their Outcomes better?”
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
Do you really care about the Outcome? Or are you only willing to do things to improve the Outcome so long as they don’t disturb all the *other* stuff you care about?
-
-
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
We often use people’s self-sacrifice as a proxy for commitment. You say you care about X — do you care enough to give up wealth and comfort for it? To give up having children? To give up eating meat?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @maxefremov
Self-sacrifice *does* indicate commitment, all else equal, but IMO it’s more revealing on the low end than the high end. Someone who never endures even mild inconvenience for his goal is not motivated;
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.