My buddy @peroxycarbonate has an idea for a battery design that should be cheaper and more energy efficient than lithium-ion batteries & could make electric cars competitive. http://www.bhauth.com/files/fbd5da5a/tech%20catalog.html …
ok, it looks like it's using different *materials* than a Li-Ion battery; how often does someone come up with that? Or, how often does someone propose a design that claims cost savings as good as yours?
-
-
(the "pitch" should give context to a complete layman as to how rare/dramatic your achievement is, I'm just trying to "rubber duck" to get you to make those comparisons because you'll get asked these questions.)
-
Sure, I understand that, but I figured I'd first need the kinds of people you find at JCESR for some sufficiently-institutionally-credentialled technical backing to go to non-technical investors.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hmm, there are several existing chemistries that periodically get new attempts, eg Li-sulfur. (Which still doesn't really work.) I'm not sure what the last chemistry with comparable novelty was, that's kind of ambiguous. Cost savings? All the time. People claim that for Li-ion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think aluminum-air, and graphene batteries got a lot of play last year, solid state comes and goes, just a look here should give you a sense https://www.google.com/search?q=new+battery+for+electric+cars&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-m …
-
Yes, I've heard of those. Al-air batteries obviously work well, they're just never going to be rechargeable. Good for missiles & torpedoes, but not so much for electric cars. Graphene is almost by definition a tiny bit of expensive mass, so using it for batteries is a novelty.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.