If you don’t have good solutions to COVID19 that doesn’t make you a bad person. If you don’t have good solutions but you send men with guns after the people who do, *now* you have blood on your hands.
-
-
If you’re writing about how the Establishment is bad, who are you writing to, and what are you teaching them or encouraging to do?
Show this thread -
You could be doing the “journalism” thing I mentioned earlier — informing people that their leaders screwed up. That’s good.
Show this thread -
Or you could be trying to change minds about a broader cultural attitude...which is what I’m constitutionally suspicious of.
Show this thread -
Telling people “you don’t think this yet but you Should” or “you won’t like this, but it’s true” is a dominance trick. It’s a neg. it plays on the fear of being criticized.
Show this thread -
“Only a [insert terrible name here] would disagree with me” is a rhetorical tactic for getting weak-minded people to passively go along with you. It’s not a way to attract competent people to actively buy in and help you.
Show this thread -
It’s kind of like — I find it skeevy to guilt-trip people into giving to charity. “You SHOULD be more generous.” The reality is, people are already pretty generous. You can provide donors *value* by offering them unusually good opportunities to help.
Show this thread -
“Put more effort/attention into MY favored project or I’ll withdraw my approval from you” is a song anyone can sing, and the loudest, nastiest voices are the best at it. I don’t think it’s a smart tactic for those whose causes are actually good.
Show this thread -
Yes, I admit I’m sensitive about this personally. I think shaming people for not being good enough causes a lot of toxic side-effects. I know sometimes the right thing to do *is* to try harder, but there are ways to encourage effort that install less malware, I think.
Show this thread -
Good exhortatory content makes doing a hard thing look necessary, exciting, and *doable by you*. Skip the last part and you just demotivate people.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can identify a problem without putting forward a proposal. Some problems, e.g. general complacency, require abstract solutions that cannot be boiled down into a policy proposal. My work on charter cities is very specific. We're not at that stage for political change
-
Complacency just seems like a weird word for it. Why choose that one?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.