6. All that said, I'm *really* not convinced that slapping tariffs and trade restrictions would "force" US manufacturing to become stronger and more robust. Maybe we'd just get poorer. It's a gamble with everyone's livelihood. Deregulating industry is safer, economically.
-
-
Replying to @s_r_constantin @EricRWeinstein
7. You *notice* it when tariffs go up. My landlord is going out of business because of tariffs. An important deal for my company fell through because of the tariffs. We *feel* that shit. Now, that's not an argument that tariffs are *net* bad, but a lot of people forget.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @s_r_constantin @EricRWeinstein
8. I've never understood the immigration thing, truly, I don't. I just don't get it. Immigrants are good. I can't do justice to the econ case better than
@bryan_caplan already did. I just...I'm confused. You're obviously neither stupid nor xenophobic. You're Jewish. WHY.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
9. My best model of your position is some kind of Straussian-cynical thing, like "Chinese grad students are obviously not going to be personally powerful in US society, because they're foreign, so this diminishes the power of scientists as a class, relative to other classes."
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
10. like, maybe "by *selectively* being more immigrant-friendly in STEM fields, the actual effect is to weaken the bargaining power of the American STEM bloc relative to other political blocs." LMK if this is a mischaracterization?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
11. my gut reaction to that is "if you're being singled out to be held to a high standard, you should advocate raising the standards for everyone else, not lowering them for yourself." Sure, end *selective* STEM immigration -- by allowing more immigration everywhere else!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
12. Now squishy shit. "Globalist"/"internationalist" culture shit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
13. I hope you understand why I go "aaaaaaaaaaa" when people go "ew, these people who lend money, go from place to place, are into spreadsheets and abstractions, and don't follow our martial/socially-conservative national traditions." You see, I *like* living.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
14. When I hear the word "bugman" I start fantasizing about finally having enough time in my schedule to go to the gun range on the regular. *I like living.* This is kinda important.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
15. So, ok. The international liberal order was set up in 1945 and it was meant to promote US interests. Nobody talks about that now except foreign countries that oppose the US, and Yarvin, but it was. "Internationalism" is a method of maintaining US global hegemony.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
16. Internationalism has bad points and good points. The bad part: lots of war. The good part: sorry but a lot of American values are good actually. I *want* girls to get to leave home and go to school or work and keep their money in their pocket and have a room of their own.
-
-
17. All that Disney-princess stuff. "I wanna be where the people are". "How far I'll go." "I can show you the world." "There must be more than this provincial life." It's ... poignant. It's a real thing. And it's a very American-universalist thing.
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
18. I *know* the other perspective that this is wrecking traditional cultures. I see that other perspective *constantly.* I'm conflicted about it; it still causes me pain. I'm just laying out that there's something lovely about Western-universalist liberalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.