You can measure how many people achieve a goal (be it increased wealth or weight loss) but if that number is low, is it because the method doesn’t work, or because few people try, or because those that do try are doing it wrong?
-
Show this thread
-
“How often can productive work result in personal wealth?” is an empirical question but a hard one to answer, so we often resort to anecdote and intuition, which aren’t enough to resolve the question.
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
It’s obvious that not *all* wealth is acquired through productivity (see: aristocrats, lottery winners, con artists) and that wealth can *ever* be acquired through productivity (see: Thomas Edison) but the magnitude matters.
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Either way, I want to live in a world where providing value to other people can be expected to result in rewards to oneself.
1 reply 0 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
The more self-interest and empathy are opposites, the more conflict and destruction we can expect. The more people are rewarded for doing nice things, the more nice things we can expect.
1 reply 4 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
The ideology that’s *definitely* pernicious, no matter which world we live in, is the one that says mutual benefit is in principle impossible or undesirable.
1 reply 0 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
It’s usually subtextual, an assumption of hostility between humans that’s never questioned. *Of course* good for me means bad for you — not just in a particular situation but by default.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
It can just be *true* that a given situation is adversarial. I’m not saying it’s wrong to notice conflicts. The thing I’m saying is bad is usually an *implicit* assumption of conflict that would sound fucked up if you ever said it out loud.
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
I don’t know the best single word for “a system that rewards behavior that benefits others”. A system where giving results in getting. Meritocratic, just, fair, incentive-aligned, cooperative, reciprocal?
4 replies 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
There are productive arguments to be had around “Don’t destroy this institution’s substantial meritocratic/just qualities” vs “this institution is already so unjust there’s not much to preserve”
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread
And there are sometimes ways to cut across the debate: proposals that tend towards meritocracy/justice regardless of how fair or unfair the world currently is.
-
-
Replying to @s_r_constantin
The biggest mistake I see younger people making is that they overweight things that are correct in absolute position yet ineffective vs effective things not fully positionally-correct, yet moving in the right direction.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.