Apparently my online network has whatever the opposite of impostor syndrome is: they think that in real life they could *outperform* what people would expect given their credentials.
-
-
Show this thread
-
We could speculate on why that is: underprivileged? talented at illegible things? not optimizing for resume-building? overconfident?
Show this thread -
I often hear people saying that *everything possible* is being done to fund and support talented/competent people, but there just aren’t enough such people. That’s not my opinion, and it seems to not be the opinion of most who answered the poll.
Show this thread -
I know from experience that there are a lot of people whose resumes look weak relative to their abilities. And I don’t think the market for them is at all competitive.
Show this thread -
I have also found that when I do a project that I can count as an “accomplishment” it’s typically both more ambitious and has less help from others than what other people count as a similar accomplishment (like “a PhD thesis”), which adds up to fewer prestige points overall.
Show this thread -
An ability to find the minimum-effort path to a claimable accomplishment seems to be essential to getting an impressive resume, and it’s not a skill people really teach or even admit exists.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.