So, a partnership is effectively an individual, so it has unlimited liability, which is the same as a soul with total depravity, infinite debt, so it's of the same kind as the supreme being, unlike, for instance, a mermaid, which can speak but doesn't have a soul.https://twitter.com/jim_rutt/status/1212747134937784320 …
-
-
The ways most people diss money are *very bad* (anti-life, anti-production) so it makes sense to have powerful defense mechanisms against any dissing of money. This is true even if you have a good critique of money; before hearing it, Jim doesn’t know that, he just has priors.
-
If Jim's processing this as though money were a person with a status to be lowered or raised, I'm confused about what the disagreement could possibly be. Clearly money isn't a *natural* person.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think the coherent position is a stronger version of the above: sure, one can in principle link these very unlike things, but the result is an unnatural category, from which one would derive conclusions that are complete nonsense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.