I think the straightforward interpretation of these statistics is that there's been massive p-hacking to produce a measured effect of talk therapy. Is there any other plausible model that produces effect sizes of around 0.5 on just about any condition treated?https://twitter.com/s_r_constantin/status/1199143897059840002 …
-
-
I'm assuming that if .5 is a standard cutoff that makes it the target size, for the same reason that there are so many studies with p just below .05. No point in holding back a study that "shows" an "effect," even if just barely, if that's publishable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree in not expecting this to be unique
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.