The natural comparison to uBiome is Theranos, because that’s another female-founded health-tech fraud. But the types of fraud are actually very different.
It might! But it isn’t in use *yet* and you have to convince doctors that it’s better than what they’re doing, and they’ll want human data, and they probably should.
-
-
So unless you can go back in time and teach doctors from the 1950s or before about machine learning, you have to run human studies.
-
“Make human studies cheaper” is a great deregulation mission. “We don’t need no stinkin’ human studies” is a terrible one. (It figures that the latter is what has gotten political traction.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.