hm. If someone said "Love is just a word" I would assume he meant "love is, in some way, shallow or not truly real". That's a legitimate opinion someone might have, and you'd have to let them talk more to know why they hold it.
Not everybody understands it as the same thing. The communication fidelity is poor. That's what cluster thinking gets you; it doesn't have the mechanisms (like one word = defined meanings) that ensure reliable transmission. Similar people get similar impressions though.
-
-
it's like GPT2. "Sounds like", "is filed near", graph metrics. Your graph is not my graph, but your graph may be like my graph if you've had similar experiences.
-
But that's not what this is about at all. It's not about trying to convey vague impressions that you explain well. It's about language that conceals.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.