Another trick is to disambiguate ambiguously used pronouns; "we" is commonly abused, and trying to replace it with the actual group that is meant can profoundly clarify the underlying meaning or lack of meaning in a statement.
the info necessary to form a logically true statement. About most situations I *cannot* make a complete sentence that I can promise will be even close to correct. Not enough data points. I'm still perceiving and classifying and associating though.
-
-
But how is this made better by using linguistically deceptive phrasings? Unless your goal is to make it seem like you already know more than you do? Again, often people will deny that unpackings of such phrases are true even if they claim the phrases are true. Red flag, that.
-
I truly don't see the deception. "Love is just a word" = "love is like those other things that are "just words", i.e. empty verbiage".
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.