There is nothing value free in anything you said any more than there are in “empirical facts” about racial differences in intelligence. I also find your epistemology deeply problematic and confused. I don’t think this means you are incapable of parsing English.
-
-
I do think I'm saying the same thing. Everyone uses context, but the debate is *to what extent* can a statement/person saying something/person being in a debate be evaluated context-free.
-
I don’t think it’s really even about degree though. The point is that the critics are right, the fact-value distinction isn’t real, and that means in the long run it’s in your best interest to defend your values, not minimize them.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
True, but "all models are wrong, but drive are useful" it might not be 100% value free, but 98% value free is probably "value free enough". Eg, here "bad actor" could have a reasonably stand in of "someone who intentionally uses AI to kill most or all people"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.