Crazy idea to reform bad incentives in science: treat lab technicians and lab engineers (i.e. employees, usually with undergrad degrees but no PhD) more like scientists.
-
-
And there's a shortage of laboratory-specialized skilled labor; for instance, the art of blowing custom lab glassware is dying out.https://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-caltech-glassblower-20160613-snap-story.html …
Show this thread -
Not to mention the obvious problem that academic code is famously bad, because most of it is written by students, not by software engineers. (Standards are rising in many fields, but when I was in grad school for math in 2015, version control was still unknown.)
Show this thread -
I don't know if this is true for everyone, but sometimes I get the impression of a weird class/prestige thing where PhDs are "scientists" and lab technicians are not. Despite the fact that technicians often earn co-authorship and that PhD students do a lot of "grunt work."
Show this thread -
If a software company had most of its code written by unpaid interns, whose official primary task was to apply for being managers, and the handful of actual full-time software engineers were treated like second-class citizens...we'd think that was pretty dysfunctional.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Many pis are already glorified lab techs. Seems as with many things, the labeling scheme has (inadvertently) sacrificed negotiation of unique roles suited for the structure of the investigation for simplicity... why? I think to achieve scale.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.