I think people underestimate the importance of "culture clash" between *professional* cultures. People expect to make allowances for people of different ages, nationalities, or genders to have different perspectives, but less so for professional backgrounds.
-
-
However, in an interdisciplinary organization, if any *one* professional ethic dominates, the organization might fail. This is why Drucker says decisions should be made by people whose "profession" is management itself -- i.e., MBAs.
Show this thread -
I'm not sure this works either; it can all too easily mean "the professional culture of managers/MBAs is the best and deserves to dominate all the others" or even "organizations should be run by those with loose moral standards". See the book Moral Mazes for a negative view.
Show this thread -
I'm more inclined to think that interdisciplinary work requires people to do "cultural exchange" and learn about different perspectives and learn to get over the initial frustration of clashing styles.
Show this thread -
I'm in favor of having strong moral boundaries -- stuff like "I will not knowingly harm a patient, I will quit or be fired first" -- but learn to tell the difference between those absolute commitments and professional conventions you could drop if necessary.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.